The Donmar is undoubtedly the most exiting space in British theatre and all the productions I have seen there have been ambitious, with varying levels of success. Therefore, it is no surprise that Henry IV could not be just played as Henry IV. The result, admittedly not instantly lovable, is a great success. I had not seen Julius Caesar so the prison setting was totally new to me. It set the atmosphere in a way that no other play I've seen has done, with the possible exception of Dominic Dromgoole's plays at the Globe.The part of the play itself is the fact that they develop the lives of the inmate's characters as well as the character's they play. It is set up as a play within a play, with these female convicts putting on a production of Henry IV. The cuts are extensive, with a 6 hours of material cut into a 2 hour show without an interval. Therefore, most of part 2 is cut in order to cut back to the main story line of choosing between two father figures. It also diverts away from the play,with a last scene which made me cry. Ashley Mcguire's Falstaff, whilst not particularly funny, is a character for whom more pathos can be felt. Erivo as Poins and Douglas is also a notable performance from a truly great actress. The other actors are also fantastic.The Donmar also seem to have prioritized experience over fame, with theatre- virgin Sharon Mooney being given one of the less substantial roles despite being one of the most recognizable faces in the cast. It also good to have normal women playing the roles instead of the 'perfect', idealised woman which is so often the case. For me, this love letter to feminism has met my expectations of what a good Shakespeare play is like, and far exceeded them.
No comments:
Post a Comment